Human brains do not belong to two distinct types: ‘female brains’ and ‘male brains’
Sex categories – whether one has female or male genitalia – are fundamental for reproduction. They are also one of the most important categories that shape the social world. No surprise then that scientists and the general public alike often assume that the sex categories penetrate beyond the genitalia to shape how people think, feel, and behave, assuming that there are female and male ‘natures’ subserved by a ‘female brain’ and a ‘male brain’, respectively. Differences between females and males in brain and behavior are often taken as evidence of this dimorphic view.Our study was the first to test whether differences between females and males in the brain ‘add up’ to create two distinct types of brains, ‘female brains’ and ‘male brains’. The rational for our study was derived from animal studies demonstrating that in contrast to sex effects on genital organs, sex effects on brain features may be opposite under different environmental conditions. That is, what is typical in one sex category (e.g., females) under some conditions may be typical in the other sex category under other conditions. As a result, brains are expected to be composed of both features more common in males compared to females and features more common in females compared to males; a situation which rarely occurs in genitalia. When it does occur, the genitalia are classified as ‘intersex’ and not as ‘male’ or ‘female’. Our analysis was designed to assess how common this ‘mixture’ of features is in the human brain.
We analyzed measures of brain structure or connectivity obtained from magnetic resonance images (MRI) of over 1400 human brains from four datasets. In each dataset, we identified a subset of between 7-12 brain regions (or connections) that mostly differed between the sexes, and determined for each brain, whether the form of each of these regions was at the side of the distribution where females were more prevalent than males (“female-end”) or at the side of the distribution where males were more prevalent than females (“male-end”). We found that regardless of the sample, age, type of magnetic resonance imaging, method of analysis, and exact definition of the “male-end” and “female-end” zones, brains that had at least one region with a “male-end” score and one region with a “female-end” score (a condition we have termed substantial variability) were more prevalent than brains that had only “male-end” or only “female-end” scores. For example, defining the “male-end” and “female-end” zones as the scores of the 33% most extreme males and females, respectively, between 23 and 53 per cent of brains (depending on the sample) had at least one region with a “male-end” score and one region with a “female-end” score, whereas the percentage of brains with all “male-end” or all “female-end” scores was between 0 and 8%. Thus, most brains are a unique ‘mosaic’ of features, some in the form more common in females compared to males, some in the form more common in males compared to females, and some in the form common in both females and males.
We corroborated our findings by a similar analysis of personality traits, attitudes, interests, and behaviors of over 5500 individuals, which revealed that internal consistency is extremely rare whereas substantial variability is very common.
Together, our results demonstrate that regardless of the cause of observed sex/gender differences in brain and behavior (nature or nurture), humans and human brains do not belong to one of two distinct types. It is time to let go of binary thinking and celebrate the fact that there are many different ways to be male, to be female, to be human.
School of Psychological Sciences and Sagol School of Neuoroscience, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic.
Joel D, Berman Z, Tavor I, Wexler N, Gaber O, Stein Y, Shefi N, Pool J, Urchs S, Margulies DS, Liem F, Hänggi J, Jäncke L, Assaf Y
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 15