Multitasking in navigation in desert ants: combining multiple strategies
The highly social ants live in nests, and all their foragers must navigate their way home after finding food. Not surprisingly then, these small-brained travelers display proficient navigational prowess. Much studied are desert ants. They keep track of the straight-line distance and direction home as they travel, a process called path integration, and also use the terrestrial panorama for navigation. In path integration, the direction of travel is determined by cues in the sky, a sky-compass, primarily in the form of the pattern of polarized light (light scattered systematically by the atmosphere) and the position of the sun. As back-up, desert ants also depend on a systematic search strategy when their major schemes of path integration and landmark guidance fail to get them home.
The classical view of the operation of navigational systems claims that one strategy works at a time. Desert ants use path integration at the start of their journey, and after some distance — the proportion of distance home depending on the species of ant—switch to using landmark guidance. When the latter strategy does not get them home, they then switch to systematic searching. Evidence that we have reviewed (Wehner et al. 2016) contradicts this sequential view, and suggests instead that available navigational schemes are in operation simultaneously in parallel, with a weighted average determining the direction of travel. The evidence supporting this parallel hypothesis stems from cases in which the ant steers an intermediate course between the directions according to two different navigational systems, in directional conflicts engineered by experimental manipulations.
For example, in one study, a single cylindrical landmark was usually placed just behind the ants’ nest as the foragers shuttled back and forth between a feeder and their nest. On occasional tests, the landmark was shifted to one side of the line from feeder to nest. Such a landmark drew desert ants in both North Africa and Australia part of the way toward the misplaced cue, suggesting that the ants were both using the landmark and integrating a path simultaneously.
As another example, North African desert ants living on a salt pan steered an intermediate direction between the directions according to the wind and the position of the sun. On the salt pan, wind direction is approximately constant through the day. Experimenters changed the wind direction on the ants’ outbound journey to a feeder by having them travel in a narrow channel, with a fan blowing wind into the channel. The homebound journey took place on the open ground where the wind direction was different from that found in the channel.
In a third series of experiments, ants were displaced from an experimentally provided feeder before their journey home. In this case celestial and terrestrial cues conflict (Fig. 1). On the one hand, sky cues, effectively at infinity, do not change with displacement of the ant, and still indicate the feeder-nest direction. On the other hand, cues on Earth such as the skyline panorama indicate a direction home from the release point to the nest. Two species of desert ants steered an intermediate course combining the cues of Earth and sky.
What these intermediate courses suggest is that different systems feed their outputs into a common central processor acting as an averaging device (Fig. 2). Each output is given a weight in the averaging. The operation of a single system corresponds to the situation in which all weights except one are near zero. Such a neurobiological architecture may well apply to other systems in other animals as well.
Ken Cheng 1 and Rüdiger Wehner 2
1Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
2Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Steering intermediate courses: desert ants combine information from various navigational routines.
Wehner R, Hoinville T, Cruse H, Cheng K
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2016 Jul
|The memories of individual ants can make the whole… Social insect colonies are famous for swarm intelligence and collective decision making – being able to come to a unified decision in groups of thousands. An ant colony, for example,…|
|Africa’s roads to ruin? Africa’s natural environments and spectacular wildlife are about to face their biggest challenge ever. In a recent paper, my colleagues and I assessed an infrastructure-expansion scheme for Africa so sweeping…|
|A novel approach to reliably predicting efficient… Working memory load is the capacity of mental effort we put into memorizing information over a period of time. Researchers use an eye-tracker as a passive implicit input device to…|
|Eccentric metallo-dielectric core-shell… High Refractive Index Dielectric (HRID) nanoparticles (NPs) have been proposed as an alternative to metallic ones due to their low absorption and magnetodielectric response in the VIS and NIR ranges.…|
|Prairie dogs kill ground squirrels to improve… Individuals of different species commonly compete with each other. African lions and spotted hyenas compete for the same prey, for example, and brown anoles and Carolina anoles frequently fight with…|
|Do children with Autism Spectrum Disorder understand… Gaze following is crucial for human social cognition, this ability develops from a low-level perceptual mechanism to a representational one. In typical development, between 6 and 12 months, infants perceive…|