Structure and function of the esophageal mucosa
Structure and function go hand-in-hand amongst the morphology, morphometry, biomechanics and secretory potential within the alimentary tract mucosa, submucosa and muscularis propria. Structure must evolve first during the development of fetus and function follows closely and progressively especially when the baby is born. The structure of the esophageal mucosa may undergo changes when it remains under the challenge of gastric acid and pepsin during episodes of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Structural changes can be as fine as dilated intercellular spaces (DIS) revealed in patients with negative endoscopically reflux disease (NERD) but still can generate heartburn symptoms, or can be very advanced as mucosal erosions seen in patients with reflux esophagitis (RE). Structural changes leading to development of endoscopically-confirmed mucosal erosions in RE will inevitably result in changing secretory function of the mucosa as well as submucosa where esophageal submucosal glands are located.
The morphological integrity of the esophageal mucosa is defined by equilibrium between aggressive factors and protective mechanisms. Aggressive factors are dominated by acid and pepsin whereas protective mechanisms, also called esophageal mucosal barrier, are represented by intraluminal neutralization of acid and proteolytic activity of pepsins by buffers, mucins, mucus accompanied by peptide growth factors, apical junction complex, ion transport, repair of potential cell injury by cell proliferation and an adequate mucosal blood flow. Esophageal mucosal barrier operates at pre-epithelial, epithelial, and post epithelial compartments and participates in prevention of epithelial injury, healing of epithelial cell necrosis and in prevention of the potential development of intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and ultimately esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Esophageal pre-epithelial barrier encompasses salivary component, represented by secretion of salivary glands and deposited on the surface of the esophageal mucosa after swallowing, and esophageal component represented by secretion of the esophageal submucosal glands also deposited on the surface epithelium. The esophageal pre-epithelial barrier components generate viscoelastic mucus-buffer layer, approximately 95 µm thick, that remains as a vanguard of mucosal protection as aggressive factors always act on the luminal aspect of the esophageal squamous epithelium. The impact of luminal acid a pepsin on the preepithelial barrier function of the mucus layer in the human esophagus is illustrated by Figure 1.
The secretory function of the esophageal submucosal mucous glands in patients with RE before and after healing.
We have designed the human esophageal perfusion catheter (US Patent No. 5,314,409) for exploration of the secretory potential of the esophageal submucosal mucous glands. Using this catheter we demonstrated significantly diminished luminal release of esophageal EGF in patients with RE vs controls. Interestingly, we have demonstrated that administration of serotonin, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)4 receptor agonist, tegaserod, resulted in significant increase of esophageal EGF secretion in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Patients with RE also exhibited significant decline of esophageal mucin secretion, however, after healing of esophageal mucosal erosions with rabeprazole, mucin secretion increased significantly. Furthermore, we demonstrated that in patients with RE the rate of luminal release of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) was significantly higher, however, after healing with proton pump inhibitors (PPI), PGE2 secretion significantly declined. Patients with NERD, however, secreted significantly more esophageal mucin, protein, but significantly less non-bicarbonate buffers and esophageal TGF α than controls.
The secretory function of salivary glands, driven by the esophago-salivary reflex, in patients with RE.
Esophageal mucosal exposure to HCl thus lowering intraluminal pH during the GER episodes evokes symptoms of heartburn stimulating esophageal intramucosal cholinergic and adrenergic chemoreceptors that initiate the so-called esophagosalivary reflex response within parasympathetic (governing inorganic components such as buffers and volume of saliva) and sympathetic (that governs secretion of salivary organic components) pathways.
We have also explored the rate of secretion of salivary protective factors using the esophageal perfusion catheter implementing perfusion with HCl, HCl/pepsin, and final saline, mimicking the natural GER scenario in patients with RE, NERD and controls. The rate of salivary EGF secretion in patients with RE was significantly lower than controls. Furthermore, salivary pH, salivary bicarbonate as well as salivary mucin and protein secretion in RE were also significantly lower than in controls. Of note, in patients with NERD we have recently demonstrated significantly augmented salivary protection. The rate of salivation in patients with NERD as well as salivary bicarbonate, mucin, EGF and TGFα secretion were also significantly higher than in controls.
Interestingly, we have demonstrated that mastication of the tasteless parafilm, that could be substituted by sugarless chewing gum in the clinical scenario, resulted in profound and significant increase in the rate of secretion of salivary protective factors in patients with RE. The volume of salivary flow increased by 215%, salivary bicarbonate secretion by 257%, salivary mucin secretion by 135%, salivary EGF secretion by 207%, and salivary PGE2 secretion by 240%. These data seem to imply that application of masticatory stimulation in clinical scenario may result in significant enhancement of mucosal protection within the pre-epithelial barrier compartment and help to restore the equilibrium between aggressive factors and protective mechanisms.
In summary, since patients with RE exhibit impairment in the rate of secretion of salivary protective factors such as EGF, bicarbonate buffers, mucin, proteins, thus their protective power within the of the esophageal pre-epithelial barrier is significantly compromised setting the stage for potential mucosal injury during excessive inflow of aggressive and highly injurious GER. On the other hand, if in patients with NERD esophageal epithelium is well preserved in spite of exposure to injurious GER one may assume that these patients may have extra benefit from protection provided by stronger flow of salivary secretion. A schematic outline of contribution of salivary secretion rich in protective factors to enhancement of the quantity and the quality of the esophageal preepithelial barrier represented by the mucus-buffer layer is illustrated by Figure 2. Salivary secretion is of great value for its protective potential as its high content of salivary mucin, proteins, and buffers makes it very viscous and easily attaching to the mucus-buffer layer covering the esophageal epithelium.
Professor of Medicine and Vice Chair for Research
Chairman, Internal Medicine Research Committee
Director of Molecular Medicine Research Laboratory
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, USA
Does the healing of the esophageal mucosa improve the function of the esophageal submucosal and salivary glands?
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016 Sep