North American tetras: Such abundant fishes, such a complex evolutionary history
Tetras of Central and North America are fishes that belong in genus Astyanax, family Characidae. They are among the most abundant and frequent freshwater fishes in tropical America. Although some authors consider all Astyanax in the region to be only one, extremely variable species, usually called “A. fasciatus”, or at most acknowledge the existence of two widespread species, A. mexicanus (northern Mexico and Texas) and A. aeneus (southern Mexico and Central America), other opinions recognize up to 18 species or more.
The article A phylogeny of Astyanax (Characiformes: Characidae) in Central and North America (published in the journal Zootaxa in 2016) presented a hypothesis (i.e. a phylogeny) for the pattern of interrelationships of 34 species of Astyanax, 27 of them once considered part of A. fasciatus in Central America and Mexico. The cladistic analysis (a method for determining which anatomical or genetic traits are evolutionarily derived and shared between species or lineages, hence supporting descent from a recent common ancestor) was based on 52 morphological characters, mostly the shape of bones in the skull and axial skeleton, but also pigmentation and meristics, with three outgroups (other characids, for comparison). The bones were made observable by means of a chemical process termed “clearing and staining”, applied to museum specimens (Fig. 1).
The analysis showed that such broadly used names as A. aeneus turned out to be non-natural, that is, they were wrongly applied before to a mixture of several lineages, so the use of the name should be restricted to the populations that form a natural group, that is, that share a most recent common ancestor to the exclusion of other populations (in the case of A. aeneus, the populations in the Pacific versant from southern Mexico to Honduras). The presence of exclusive characters support recognition of several new species, not just one (fasciatus) or two (aeneus and mexicanus). There were only five resolved clades (i.e., natural species groups ¾ see Fig. 2), three of them including both Brazilian and Central American species, one purely Nicaraguan, and one for central-northern Mexico and Texas, the latter being the most derived (i.e., recently evolved) group. The genus Bramocharax, a name traditionally applied to long-snouted characins, was not recovered as a natural group, and thus it was confirmed to be a synonym of Astyanax; the snout and other traits turned out to be homoplasies, i.e., characters that evolved independently in parallel. Coincidence with previous cladistic hypotheses based on molecules rather than bones was not complete to every detail, but the main picture holds as here described. The findings point at a more complex biogeographic history of the region than usually recognized: the traditional view claims that Neotropical fishes, among them the Characidae, invaded North America from South America in the last few million years. However, the occurrence of Brazilian species within Central American clades bespeaks a secondary “back to South America” pattern, which has been observed also in evolutionary hypotheses for other freshwater fishes in the tropical New World. These results change the estimation of species biodiversity and hence the conservation strategies; the conservation of seemingly arcane little fishes may seem removed from more urgent needs, but one should remember that biotically healthy freshwaters, with all their native species present, are the hallmark of an environment that is able to provide all ecosystem services to the human population living in those basins.
Juan J. Schmitter-Soto
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Chetumal, Mexico
A phylogeny of Astyanax (Characiformes: Characidae) in Central and North America.
Zootaxa. 2016 May 6