Since about mid-1700 western ideology increasingly emphasizes individualism and the distinction between a person and his or her social environment. But the separation between oneself and others has been shown to vary between individuals and even from situation to situation. For instance, emphasizing commonalities and having people marked relational pronouns (we, us, ours) in a text promotes the integration of others into one’s own self-representation.

Examples for the neutral-looking (left) and smiling (right) three-dimensional heads/faces that moved either in synchrony with the participant’s own head movements or with a noticeable delay.

In a recent study, Ma and colleagues (2016) have studied another way to promote other-integration. They used sensors and Kinect™ to measure the head movements of human participants online. The participants were exposed to a virtual three-dimensional human head, which in one condition moved and rotated in synchrony with their own head movements, and in another condition with a noticeable delay. As suggested by previous findings, participants had a stronger feeling of the virtual head becoming a part of their own body or self in the synchrony condition than in the delay condition.

Next, the authors made the virtual head either look neutral or smile either before or after the manipulation of synchrony or delay. If the face looked neutral or if it smiled before the synchrony/delay manipulation, there was no change of the participant’s mood. After experiencing synchrony with a smiling face, however, participants became significantly happier and improved in a mood-sensitive creativity task (brainstorming).

These observations suggest that our self-representation can be rather plastic and include other individuals, be they real or virtual in nature. If we integrate others into our self-representation, we also seem to start confusing our own features and states with the features and states of the other, so that the happiness of the other becomes our own.

This demonstration of “mood migration” from other two self has important implications for social interaction. On the positive side, we can apparently literally adopt mental states of close others and benefit from them. On the negative side, however, we may also take over negative attitudes and literally make them our own.

Bernhard Hommel
Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

Publication

Mood migration: How enfacing a smile makes you happier.
Ma K, Sellaro R, Lippelt DP, Hommel B
Cognition. 2016 Jun

Read offline:     

Related Articles:

	The complex regulation and functional significance of size… Across animals, variation in body size is often influenced by environmental conditions and is considered to have adaptive value. In bees, in which many species show various degrees of sociality,…
	Social-economic factors predict state differences in opioid… Media accounts of the opioid overdose epidemic emphasize the role of prescription drugs and, to a lesser extent, declining economic and social conditions. In support of the journalists’ accounts, opioid…
	Why do some people self-harm under distress? Harvard study… Self-harm, or non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), refers to people intentionally hurting themselves without intending suicide. Common examples include cutting, burning, or hitting oneself. A growing number of adolescents and young adults…
	Predictive sensing: the role of motor signals in sensory… The brain receives sensory information and uses it to build a representation of our environment and guide our behaviors. However, these voluntary actions in turn also lead to stimulation of…
	Supportive relationships in children and adolescents facing… In the context of mass trauma events such as political violence and natural disasters, children and adolescents are inherently more vulnerable to maladjustment and psychopathology than adults. Despite this, many…
	Finding ‘someone like me’: key benefits of non-12-step… Problem drinking is a significant issue in the UK with a 20% increase in deaths from specific alcohol-related causes in 2020. UK and USA national guidance on treating problem drinking…