You are what you do: how we construct the mental image of our body

We commonly take our body for granted and have no doubt that our right hand, say, is part of our body. However, recent demonstrations of the rubber-hand illusion suggest that the mental representation of our body is rather fragile and plastic. In this illusion (BBC, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxwn1w7MJvk) people are facing a rubber hand laying close to one of their own hands, which however is hidden from view. Stroking real and rubber hand in synchrony creates the illusion that the rubber hand becomes part of one’s own body up to the degree that one starts sweating and withdraws one’s real hand if the rubber hand is being attacked by a hammer. Researchers have claimed that this is only because the rubber hand look so similar to our real hand, so that our permanent body image (our mental body representation) is sufficiently fooled to accept the fake hand.

Fig. 1. Participants (Left) wore an orientation tracker and a data glove on their right hand, (Right) which was covered by cloth and a wooden box, and they saw a virtual balloon that they could make grow or shrink by opening or closing their hand, accordingly. The figure shows Ke Ma, the first author of the cited article.

Fig. 1. Participants (Left) wore an orientation tracker and a data glove on their right hand, (Right) which was covered by cloth and a wooden box, and they saw a virtual balloon that they could make grow or shrink by opening or closing their hand, accordingly. The figure shows Ke Ma, the first author of the cited article.

However, a recent study of Ma and Hommel (2015) suggests that our body representation is much more plastic. They had participants wear a data glove with built-in vibrators, which was hidden from view but operating a virtual hand shown on a screen. If the virtual hand moved in synchrony with the participant’s real hand movements, participants were more likely to accept the virtual hand as their own. Interestingly, they also accepted a virtual balloon that synchronously grew or shrunk in size with opening and closing the hand, respectively, as part of their own body, and even a virtual square that changed color in synchrony with the movements of the real hand.

These observations suggest that the key factor that determines whether people do or do not accept an object or event as part of their own body is agency, that is, the ability to control the behavior of that object or event in space and time. This possibility fits with earlier philosophical assumptions that agency is crucial for distinguishing between one’s environment and one’s body—we can perceive both but only (fully) control the latter.

The apparently considerable plasticity of our body representation fits with recent insights from prosthetics and opens exciting avenues for the development of on-distance-action tools, as necessary for medical operations on distance or controlling robots on Mars.

Publication

The role of agency for perceived ownership in the virtual hand illusion.
Ma K, Hommel B.
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Nov

Facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinmailFacebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinmail

Leave a Reply