Do low frequency electromagnetic fields interfere with cellular physiology?
Electromagnetic radiation, fields, or waves have been around since the birth of the universe, with daylight as the most familiar one. We are continuously exposed to different EMFs, mostly without even noticing them. Depending on their frequency, they may be either ionising or non-ionising (Fig. 1). Low frequency electromagnetic fields (LF EMF) are non-ionising and are generally considered harmless as they are considered to pass through our body without interference with the cellular tissue.
Recent decades have seen a huge increase in the use of electronic devices that nowadays enable us to communicate with distant family, enjoy music everywhere or order food without leaving the house. However besides the benefits, this evolution has also resulted in increased public concern about potential adverse health effects of non-ionizing radiation that these devices emit. The symptoms attributed to continuous LF EMF exposure range from non-specific physical symptoms, such as fatigue, headaches, and redness of the skin to increased prevalence of childhood leukaemia. Although many theories regarding a potential mechanism of induction are put forward, to date no clear mechanism of action has been elucidated. Experimental evidence that could support an association between exposure and health status appears to be insufficient and inconsistent. Theoretical approaches and experimental studies indicate that it is highly unlikely that LF EMFs directly induce DNA damage and subsequent carcinogenetic effects, like ionising radiation is capable of. For this reason, many studies focus on other decisive fundamental biological processes and signal transduction pathways in the cell. One common pathway prevails: the mobilization of calcium within the cell, immediately after a stimulatory signal is perceived. In normal conditions this calcium mobilization is short-lived and is needed to induce several cellular cascades that promote cell activity upon physiological stimulation. Also for this parameter, the studies on potential effects of LF EMF are conflicting.
Therefore, we performed a systematic review and subsequent meta-analyses. In our systematic review, we investigated if there is already evidence in current literature regarding a modulation of the cellular calcium homeostasis by LF EMF exposure. Unlike most systematic reviews examining in vivo studies and clinical trial data, we evaluated studies that used ex vivo and in vitro cell cultures. For this, we selected a group of in vitro studies based on a strict set of quality criteria on both the biological and physical aspects of the reported data. From our comprehensive approach, we concluded that there is a very weak association between LF EMF exposure and intracellular calcium concentrations as well as the frequency of oscillating calcium waves. Furthermore, we reported that there might be EMF sensitive cell types that could explain the contradictory reports in literature. In addition, field strengths below 200 µT, frequencies other than 50/60 Hz, or exposure periods shorted than 60 minutes showed to also be associated with increased intracellular calcium. From the papers we also extracted all parameters required to calculate the induced electric fields in the experimental set-up. The strength of these fields showed to be associated to an increased intracellular calcium concentration. However, this correlation was dependent on the presence of parasitic fields. This indicated that also uncontrolled induced electric fields could unintentionally influence in vitro outcomes and cause discrepancy in literature.
Lieke A Golbach, Lucas A Portelli, Huub FJ Savelkoul, Sofie R Terwel, Niels Kuster, Rob BM de Vries, BM Lidy Verburg-van Kemenade1
1Cell Biology & Immunology
Dept. of Animal Sciences
Wageningen University, The Netherlands
Publication
Calcium homeostasis and low-frequency magnetic and electric field exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.
Golbach LA, Portelli LA, Savelkoul HF, Terwel SR, Kuster N, de Vries RB, Verburg-van Kemenade BM.
Environ Int. 2016 Feb 9
Related Articles:
![]() | Does UV-B radiation modify gene expression? Frequently the harsh environmental conditions, such as, high temperatures, low freezing conditions, high levels of PAR and UV-B sun radiation induce remarkable adaptive reactions in plants. These responses suggest that… |
![]() | Murburn concept explains why oxygen is acutely… Murburn concept (from “mured burning”, signifying a restricted uncontrolled oxidative process) provides a tangible rationale why oxygen is so quintessential for immediate maintenance of life-order. It postulates that oxygen-centered diffusible… |
![]() | No adverse outcomes for infants associated with mums… What is whooping cough, or pertussis? Whooping cough, or pertussis, is a highly contagious bacterial respiratory infection that can be very serious for young infants. Symptoms include violent coughing fits… |
![]() | Making Christmas trees under duress, or how cells… Some of the most enduring images for a molecular biologist are electron microscopy micrographs of the so-called “Christmas trees”, famously first observed by Oscar Miller from newt oocytes in 1969.… |
![]() | Rabbits with mammary carcinomas as a model for… Within a breeding colony of rabbits, the American pathologist Harry Greene (1904-1969) observed that mammary carcinomas were restricted to certain families. This is suggestive of a familiar predisposition as it… |
![]() | The allergies go marching on: the atopic march and… Atopic/allergic family of diseases affects >20% of the global population and encompasses allergic asthma, hay fever, food allergy, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis. Frequently, individuals with an allergic condition develop… |













Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.