As people get older, lower back and leg pain is a common and often debilitating problem, preventing simple tasks including walking. Unfortunately it is unavoidable because of simple wear-and-tear of the discs and joints that make up the spine. Fusion surgery is an effective management option where conservative therapy has failed. An implant is placed between two lumbar vertebrae to allow fusion of the lower spine where the pain originates.

Fig. 1. A. The various approaches to the lumbar spine for fusion surgery. ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion. LLIF = lateral lumbar interbody fusion. OLIF = oblique lumbar interbody fusion. PLIF = posterior lumbar interbody fusion. TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. B. The OLIF approach uses a natural corridor between the major blood vessels overlying the spine and the psoas muscle on the side, which avoids the disadvantages of ALIF and LLIF.

There are many approaches to the lower spine for fusion surgery, each with their own advantages and disadvantages (Fig. 1A). An approach from the front through the abdomen called ALIF and an approach from the side through the flank called LLIF are two commonly used techniques. However the ALIF approach requires manipulation of the bowels and the large vessels that run on top of the lower spine. As a result there is the danger of perforating the bowel or catastrophic bleeding from injury to the major vessels. While the LLIF was developed to address these concerns, cutting through an important muscle mass adjacent to the lower spine, in which a number of nerves to the leg run through, has its own disadvantages. Thigh pain and weakness are commonly reported complications of this approach.

The oblique approach, called OLIF, is the proposed solution to the disadvantages of ALIF and LLIF (Fig. 1B). This technique uses a natural corridor that occurs between the major vessels running over the spine and the psoas muscle mass which lies on the side of and adjacent to the lower spine. A handful of studies have been conducted, reporting on the complications and outcomes of the OLIF technique, however these are few in number and of low level evidence to drastically change the standard of care.

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken in this study to collate the existing knowledge of OLIF, its technical aspects, complications and effectiveness. A total of 16 studies were selected, from which promising results were demonstrated in aspects of operative blood loss, operative time, success of surgery and risk of complications. The most common complication identified was thigh pain/numbness (3.0% patients) and thigh weakness (1.2% patients). However the studies available, from which these results were derived from, provide low quality evidence, with the absence of controls and randomization in the studies limiting definitive conclusions to be drawn.

What this study demonstrates however is that the early results on the OLIF technique are promising. Further investigation in the form of well-designed studies is warranted to establish the role of the OLIF technique in spinal fusion surgery.

Jia Xi Julian Li ¹, Ralph Mobbs ^1,2
1Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales. Sydney, NSW, Australia
²Prince of Wales Hospital. Sydney, NSW, Australia

Publication

Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Aspects, Operative Outcomes, and Complications.
Li JX, Phan K, Mobbs R
World Neurosurg. 2017 Feb

Read offline:     

Related Articles:

	Spinal nerve involvement in early Guillain-Barré… Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute-onset, immune-mediated disorder of the peripheral nervous system, which is currently divided into several subtypes based on electrodiagnostic, pathological and immunological criteria. GBS includes at…
	Eye drops for preventing dry eye in adverse environments Dry eye disease is a common chronic condition, affecting between 5% and 50% of the adult population in different parts of the world. Adverse environmental conditions, including low relative humidity…
	Increased time incongruence between imagined and… Mental chronometry is commonly used to evaluate motor imagery ability. Mental chronometry measures imagined time required for movement. Smaller differences between imagined and actual times suggest higher motor imagery. Imagined…
	Ankylosing spondylitis: what you should know about… The aim of this review article was to provide the required clinical knowledge that radiologists need to know and the relevant radiological semiotics that clinicians require in diagnosing clinically significant…
	How do cats avoid small obstacles during walking? Avoiding obstacles obstructing a walkway is a usual, but not a trivial motor task. A lot of work had been done so far to elucidate how biped humans solve this…
	The arms really can give the legs a helping hand in… The emergence of upright, bipedal walking is a characteristic of human evolution that separate us from our quadrupedal cousins—other animals. The upright walking posture freed our hands so that we…