Blood has been recognized as a life giving force from time immemorial. The first recorded attempt at human to human transfusion was recorded in 1492 when Pope Innocent VII succumbed in an attempt at a transfusion. Successful blood transfusion did not occur until over 400 years later in 1901 when we learned about the unique fingerprint proteins on the blood cell surface that would allow blood to be safely matched from donor to recipient, the ABO blood antigen system. Further refinements were made in crossmatching and blood preservation techniques and by 1980 over 14 million units of blood were being transfused annually in this country alone. This changed abruptly in 1981 when the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) first entered the system and was found to be transmitted by blood transfusion with devastating results. Since that time, we have become much more judicious in our use of blood transfusion.
Although presently the blood supply is 99% safe from infection due to our ability to accurately test for the majority of infectious organisms, we learned from the HIV experience that a blood transfusion was rarely necessary, in the absence of active bleeding, if the oxygen carrying protein in the blood cells, hemoglobin, was above 7 or 8 even though a normal hemoglobin is 13 or 14.
In the 1980s, scientists were able to isolate a natural hormone, erythropoietin that stimulates blood production. This discovery opened the door for a way to improve blood counts without transfusion. This hormone can be given as an injection under the skin. The first major use was in patients with end stage kidney disease. The hormone is made by the kidney cells and therefore deficient in people with advanced kidney failure. By giving erythropoietin, we are able to restore blood production to normal in these patients. The use of this hormone expanded to other uses and, in particular, as a means to maintain the red blood cell counts at a safe level following suppression that occurs with chemotherapy in many cases, avoiding blood transfusion. Unfortunately, in 2007, data from clinical trials in certain cancer types, showed worrisome trends for accelerated cancer growth in some patients receiving erythropoietin derivatives. Regulatory agencies put strict guidelines in place on use of erythropoietic agents for patients getting chemotherapy for potentially curative cancers. Cancer doctors began to liberalize transfusion use again.
In this context, we were interested in current transfusion patterns in patients receiving blood cell suppressive chemotherapy. What were the patients’ main concerns and what were the physicians main concerns when evaluating a patient for blood transfusion? Did the type of cancer matter? Did the chemotherapy regimen matter? Did associated medical conditions influence the decision to transfuse? Were there additional factors that influenced the decision of when to transfuse? We conducted a prospective, observational study of transfusion practice patterns in patients receiving chemotherapy. We observed that no one would wait until the hemoglobin was less than 7 to give a transfusion, especially if the patient was older, but most physicians were more conservative and recommended a transfusion if Hemoglobin was in the 8-9 range and did not follow stricter transfusion guidelines for non-chemotherapy/non-cancer patients, especially when patients were not candidates for erythropoietin. Of interest, the type cancer or the particular chemotherapy regimen were not major determinants in the decision to transfuse. Fatigue, which is quite a subjective complaint, and as likely to be the result of the cancer itself and the chemotherapy treatment, turned out to be a major reason a patient desired a transfusion and a major determinant of whether a physician ordered a transfusion. At the end of the day, patient symptoms trumped absolute Hemoglobin numbers as the main determinant for both physicians and patients as to when a transfusion was appropriate.
Acknowledgements: This study was generously supported and conducted by AMGEN
Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology Cone Health, teaching affiliate University of NC, Chapel Hill 1200 N Elm St, Greensboro, NC 27401, USA
PublicationTransfusion practice patterns in patients with anemia receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for nonmyeloid cancer: results from a prospective observational study.
Granfortuna J, Shoffner K, DePasquale SE, Badre S, Bohac C, De Oliveira Brandao C
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Jun
|Donor in recipient - dangers in DNA profiling after… The incidence of cancers, which rank among some of the most common lifestyle diseases of the 21st century, is rising steadily year by year. The trend is attributable to the…|
|A novel and quick method to study the drug… Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), a retrovirus, was discovered independently by Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo in 1983. As per the WHO report of 2015, globally, around 40 million people are…|
|Improving outcomes after liver transplantation using… The global shortage of livers for transplantation has necessitated the use of increasingly marginal organs. Many countries have seen a recent increase in deceased organ donors but many of these…|
|Evolution of the art and science of kidney… Once considered prohibitive, kidney transplantation in HIV (+) recipients is achieving outcomes similar to comparable recipients without HIV. These successes are possible because of incremental improvements in care that resulted…|
|The community-based management of child malnutrition… Acute malnutrition (wasting) remains a major global public concern and a public health priority in Sub-Saharan Africa, especially in countries where high prevalence of HIV/AIDS infection and food insecurity coexist.…|
|Uremia. A history of urine in the blood The term uremia was first introduced in 1847; literally translated, it means “urine in the blood.” Today, uremia describes the myriad of symptoms and organ derangements that result from the…|