How do spaghetti-like bacteria regulate their size?
Why is your thumb longer than your pinky? Answering this question and, more in general, to understand how tissues/organs regulate their size and proportions, requires to understand how individual cells control their size. Bacteria are probably the simplest organism to address this question. Bacteria typically grow to double their size and divide around the middle. By repeating this process, the bacterial population reaches a cell size distribution that is narrow and stable, i.e., size homeostasis is achieved. You might now think “OK! problem solved”. However, the devil is in the details…how does a bacterium “know” that it has grown enough to divide?
Experiments have revealed different relations between the size at birth and the size when a cell divide. Thus, cells follow one of the following rules: timer, sizer, or adder (Fig. 1A). The timer implies that cells, regardless of their size at birth, follow an internal clock, grow during a specific amount of time, and then divide. This mechanism suggests that cells, after growth and division, maintain their birth sizes and size convergence cannot be cannot achieved. The sizer implies that cells can measure distances, they grow until reaching a critical size, and then divide. This mechanism can certainly correct fluctuations of the size at birth and convergence is achieved. Finally, the adder means that cells accumulate the same amount of mass from birth to division. As shown in Figure 1A, the adder, combined with a symmetric division (division at the middle), also leads to size convergence and homeostasis after a number of generations. Most bacterial species, e.g., E. coli, follow this latter size control mechanism. Problem solved? No…again, the devil is in the details. As we just insinuated, the cleavage location is key: how does a bacterium “know” where is the middle? To cut a long story short, bacteria are able to assemble a division machinery at regular intervals along the cell. If cells have “normal” sizes, only one division site is formed by the middle and a symmetric division occurs. However, if cells grow longer, multiple division sites are created and, consequently, a cell can divide at different locations (Fig. 1B). How is this possibly relevant to us? Well, nature is full of exceptions and under stress, e.g., antibiotic treatment, cells develop a filamentous morphology (spaghetti-like). Can filamentous cells still achieve size homeostasis/convergence?
Recent studies have suggested that the adder rule is satisfied during filamentation. And yet, how can adder be compatible with a sizer property that “quantizes” multiple division locations with regular spacing? Moreover, since there are several possible cleavage sites, how important is this election? To understand the elongation/division of cells that undergo anomalous growth we proposed a mathematical model (Fig. 1C). Cells are modeled as sets of rods with different potential division sites. Upon growth/division, cells probabilistically explore different size configurations. Interestingly, we showed that a sizer property of individual cells can be reconciled with adder at a population level, and that the observed correlation between the sizes at birth and division is independent of the division pattern (e.g., division close to middle, close to poles, etc.) and size convergence is achieved. We also analyzed experimental data and concluded that E. coli cells during filamentation more likely follow a division pattern that favors cleavage close to the poles. In summary, our research clarifies how anomalously growing cells are able to achieve size homeostasis and paves the way to understand phenotypic diversity in bacterial colonies under stress conditions.
Yanyan Chen 1, Javier Buceta 1,2
1Department of Bioengineering, Lehigh University, Iacocca Hall, 111 Research Dr., Bethlehem, PA, USA
2Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Lehigh University, Iacocca Hall, 111 Research Dr., Bethlehem, PA, USA
A Markovian Approach towards Bacterial Size Control and Homeostasis in Anomalous Growth Processes.
Chen Y, Baños R, Buceta J
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 25