What’s really in human milk? Studying microbiota in a novel body site
Breastfeeding is the gold standard of infant nutrition as it reduces children’s risk of developing obesity, asthma, allergies, diabetes, and numerous other medical conditions. This has been historically understood by the fact that breastmilk is rich in nutrients, immunological factors and growth factors. Recent research has revealed that human milk also contains microorganisms collectively referred to as a microbiota. With breastmilk as the primary source of food for many infants, identifying bacteria common to human milk is one of the first steps towards understanding its functional significance, as well as the role of the mother’s environment in shaping her milk’s microbial landscape. Studies have characterized these bacterial communities from mothers in singular regions of the world. Our systematic review published by the Journal of Nutrition in Clinical Practice analyzed the results of these different studies to characterize the commonalities and diversity of the human milk microbiota.
479 articles indexed in the PubMed biomedical and life sciences database from its founding in 1964 to June 30, 2015 met our search terms: “microbiome OR microbiota OR anaerobic OR anaerobe OR metagenome AND (human milk OR breast milk)”. 12 of these articles qualified for formal manuscript evaluation as they met our inclusion criteria: they were primary studies of the bacterial diversity and composition of exclusively human subjects’ milk using culture-independent methods that reported results at the genus level. These studies were conducted in Canada, Spain, Finland, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. They collected the milk at varying postpartum time points using different qualifications of maternal health and aseptic milk collection techniques. Eight used conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods and four used next-generation sequencing (NGS), the latter of which is a more sensitive method to identify and quantify bacterial communities.
We noted the bacterial species and genera that were identified as present and predominant within the milk of mothers that each of the 12 studies sampled. Streptococcus was identified in the milk of mothers from 11 studies and Staphylococcus in 10 studies. These two genera were identified as predominant in 6 of the 12 studies, followed by Bifidobacterium in 3 studies and Lactobacillus in 2. We found no patterns in species-level microbial presence or predominance. Streptococcus and Staphylococcus were identified as predominant in each of four studies that used NGS but in only two of the eight that used conventional PCR. From this we conclude that Streptococcus and Staphylococcus appear to be widely predominant in human milk regardless of differences in geographic location and analytical methods. Since NGS is a more rigorous analytical method, we suggest that predominance of Streptococcus and Staphylococcus may be underestimated in studies using older, conventional analytical methods.
Our finding that only two genera are consistently predominant in the human milk microbiota diverge from the results of two previous primary studies, which identified a “core 9” and “core 7” list of genera that comprise it. Streptococcus, Staphylococcus and Lactobacillus were the only genera identified by both to be predominant. Given that the two studies were conducted on separate American and Spanish populations, these findings are consistent with our conclusion that Streptococcus and Staphylococcus may be widely predominant in human milk. Our project warrants study of the plasticity of the infant gut microbiota and ability of human milk to modulate it.
John L. Fitzstevens 1, Kelsey C. Smith 2,3, James I. Hagadorn 2,3,4, Melissa J. Caimano 5,6, Adam P. Matson 3,4,7, Elizabeth A. Brownell 2,3,4
1Department of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania, USA
2Connecticut Human Milk Research Center, Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
3Division of Neonatology, Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
4Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
5Department of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
6Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
7Department of Immunology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Systematic Review of the Human Milk Microbiota.
Fitzstevens JL, Smith KC, Hagadorn JI, Caimano MJ, Matson AP, Brownell EA
Nutr Clin Pract. 2017 Jun
|Does non-clinical maternal depression have a lasting… The special emotional bond that forms between a mother and her infant appears very early in life. Integral to this relationship is the infant’s ability to be able to detect…|
|Improving asthma control, one school at a time Asthma is a big problem: it affects almost 10% of children in the United States and costs $56 billion a year in direct and indirect costs. Every day, 36,000 children…|
|Grandmothers’ breastfeeding stories to mothers: a… Breastfeeding is an ideal way to feed babies that promotes and protects health throughout life. In the Northwest Territories, Canada, in follow-up to a study from one region of the…|
|If you need a reason to become a furry pet lover,… For decades, we have known that children growing up with furry pets have lower rates of asthma than those who do not, an observation attributed to the hygiene hypothesis. As…|
|Cyagen Biosciences – Helping you choose the right… While many animal models are available “ off the shelf ” through various repositories and collaborations, generation of novel animal models has allowed for more effective studies, not limited by…|
|What about the real costs of next generation… Human genetics diagnostics (HGD), which always has to go together with human genetic counselling, is a rapidly developing field. HGD may become necessary in case of familial cancer syndromes, infertility,…|